Not a survey. This is what came up in 141 staff discovery conversations, read one at a time, alongside what 1,516 classified campus AI policies show about how institutions are writing the rules.
Deflected, or answered factually with no read on AI
Leaned towards concerns, limits, or not using it
Said something either way, without leaning far
Asked to learn more, stopped short of a view
Leaned clearly towards approval
AI does the assignment, so the thinking never happens
Hallucinated, stale or generic AI content passed off as fact
No reliable way to separate AI text from student text without false accusations
No institutional policy, training or tool vetting to point staff at
Student and college records pasted into tools that may train on them
Grading, course content and embedded features displacing instructors
Phishing, ghost-student aid fraud and vendor spam at machine scale
Phones, smart glasses and lens search defeat proctoring
Every published campus AI policy we can find, read and scored. Free to browse.
Access the AI Policy Database
Schedule a free 60-minute AI Assessment Consult. We'll learn about your team, the decisions you're facing, and where AI may fit, then help you determine whether an assessment makes sense.